|
Sabine River Authority of |
Sabine River Authority Phone 409-746-2192 |
2003 Basin Summary Report
Activities and Accomplishments
CRP and Basin Goals/Objectives
Coordination/Cooperation with other Basin Entities
Public Information and Education Activities
Sabine Basin Steering Committee
Sabine Basin
Water Quality Summary
Secondary Water Quality Concerns
Total Maximum Daily Load Categories and Rankings
Reach 1 - Representative Monitoring Sites
Reach 1 - Spatial Analysis Summary
Reach 1 - Subwatershed Summary
Reach 2 - Representative Monitoring Sites
Reach 2 - Subwatershed Summary
Reach 3 - Representative Monitoring Sites
Reach 3 - Spatial Analysis Summary
Reach 3 - Subwatershed Summary
Reach 4 - Representative Monitoring Sites
Reach 4 - Spatial Analysis Summary
Reach 4 - Subwatershed Summary
Reach 5 - Representative Monitoring Sites
Reach 5 - Spatial Analysis Summary
Reach 5 - Subwatershed Summary
Reach 6 - Representative Monitoring Sites
Reach 6 - Spatial Analysis Summary
Reach 6 - Subwatershed Summary
Reach 7 - Representative Monitoring Sites
Reach 7 - Spatial Analysis Summary
Reach 7 - Subwatershed Summary
Upper Sabine
Basin Assessment Map
Lower Sabine Basin Assessment Map
Upper Sabine Basin Water Quality Assessment Sites
Lower Sabine Basin Water Quality Assessment Sites
Upper Sabine Basin Trend Analysis Sites
Lower Sabine Basin Trend Analysis Sites
Reach 1 Water Quality Issues Map
Reach 2 Water Quality Issues Map
Reach 3 Water Quality Issues Map
Reach 4 Water Quality Issues Map
Reach 5 Water Quality Issues Map
Reach 6 Water Quality Issues Map
Reach 7 Water Quality Issues Map
Sabine Basin Petroleum Wells Map
Since initial operational activities began in 1954, the Sabine River Authority of Texas (SRA) has taken an active role in water quality matters and over the years has expanded its services to meet increasing needs throughout the Sabine River Basin. The SRA was established with responsibilities to control, store, preserve, and distribute the waters of the Sabine River and its tributary streams for useful purposes.
The water quality laboratory services and field programs are conducted by the Environmental Services Division (ESD) which operates a modern, well-equipped water quality testing laboratory near Orange. The SRA provides these services because they fulfill demonstrated needs and have proven to be beneficial for the SRA and its customers in managing and protecting the water resources in the Sabine Basin.
As part of its commitment to serve the evolving water resource needs of the Sabine Basin, SRA reorganized the Water Resources Branch (WRB) creating a new division, Resource Management/ Project Development (RMPD). The focus of the RMPD is to assist in water resource planning and development activities such as water supply, water resources protection, water quality issues, information management, and environmental services support.
The SRA uses a watershed approach to assess water quality conditions in the Sabine Basin. This methodology includes all available information in the SRA Watershed Inventory. In addition to water quality data collected by the SRA, datasets for the inventories have been received from a number of sources including municipalities, government agencies (local, state, and federal), and universities. Water quality data was not available for some subwatersheds, but assessments were possible due to the information available in the subwatershed Inventories. Data from September 1998 through August 2003 (5 years) were analyzed for this summary report. Trend analyses were also conducted for representative sites using water quality data collected from September 1993 through August 2003 (10 years). Spatial analyses were performed by subwatershed to correlate the water quality conditions with environmental factors.
Water quality assessment summaries were developed by analyzing water quality data and all other available information for each subwatershed. The primary water quality issues are elevated bacteria levels and low dissolved oxygen. The problems tend to be in small streams with low elevation gradients. In most cases the problems occur infrequently and do not appear to significantly impact the designated use of the water body. Some of the impacts are due to excessive loading from point sources, but many of the concerns are the result of non-point source pollution or natural conditions. Assessments are presented below for each subwatershed in the Sabine Basin.
Sabine Basin Water Quality Summary
|
Segment/ |
Descriptions |
TCEQ Draft 2004 Texas 303(d) List |
SRA Assessment of Water Quality Issues |
Water Quality
Condition |
Level of Potential Impacts |
Recommendations |
||
|
TCEQ |
SRA |
|||||||
|
501 |
1.00 |
Main-stem |
|
Localized Areas of Elevated
Bacteria |
Adequate |
Low |
|
Additional E. coli Monitoring |
|
|
1.01 |
Black Bayou - LA |
|
No Known Issues |
Excellent |
Low |
|
|
|
511 |
1.02 |
Cow Bayou |
Low Dissolved Oxygen, High
Fecal Coliform, Elevated pH (Segment 0511 & 4 Additional Sub-segments) |
Low Dissolved Oxygen, High
Fecal Coliform, Elevated pH |
Poor |
High |
Conducting TMDL |
Conducting TMDL |
|
508 |
1.03 |
Adams Bayou |
Low Dissolved Oxygen, High
Fecal Coliform, (Segment 0508 & 3 Additional Sub-segments) |
Low Dissolved Oxygen, High
Fecal Coliform |
Poor |
High |
Conducting TMDL |
Conducting TMDL |
|
|
1.04 |
Burton Shell Canal - LA. |
|
No Known Issues |
|
Low |
|
|
|
|
1.05 |
Intracoastal Waterway - LA. |
|
No Known Issues |
Excellent |
Low |
|
|
|
|
1.06 |
Conway Bayou - LA. |
|
No Known Issues |
|
Low |
|
|
|
|
1.07 |
Phoenix Lake (Oil Field) Confluence - LA. |
|
No Known Issues |
|
Low |
|
|
|
|
1.08 |
Old Hwy 90 Canal - LA. |
|
No Known Issues |
|
Low |
|
|
|
|
1.09 |
Coopers Gully (City of Orange) |
|
No Known Issues |
Adequate |
Medium |
|
|
|
|
1.10 |
Little Cypress Bayou |
Chronic Toxicity in Three
Areas of One sub-segment |
High Organic Loading |
Poor |
Medium |
Conduct TMDL for Chronic Toxicity |
Conduct Sampling After Changes
in Discharge Status |
|
|
1.11 |
High-Line Canal - LA. |
|
No Known Issues |
|
Low |
|
|
|
|
1.12 |
Big Bayou at Big Eddy - LA. |
|
No Known Issues |
|
Low |
|
|
|
|
1.13 |
Old Sabine River Confluence - LA. |
|
No Known Issues |
|
Low |
|
|
|
|
1.14 |
Drainage Channel |
|
No Known Issues |
Adequate |
Low |
|
|
|
503 |
2.00 |
Main-stem |
|
No Known
Issues |
Excellent |
Low |
|
|
|
|
2.01 |
Swift Lake/ Big Cypress
Creek |
|
No Known
Issues |
Excellent |
Medium |
|
|
|
|
2.02 |
Nichols Creek |
Chronic Toxicity, Low Dissolved Oxygen, Elevated Fecal
Coliform |
Low Dissolved Oxygen, Elevated Fecal Coliform |
Adequate |
Low |
Conduct
TMDL for Chronic Toxicity |
Natural
Conditions - No Further Action Warranted |
|
|
2.03 |
Slaydons Creek |
|
No Known
Issues |
|
Low |
|
|
|
|
2.04 |
Brushy Creek - LA. |
|
No Known
Issues |
|
Low |
|
|
|
513 |
2.05 |
Big Cow Creek |
|
No Known
Issues |
Excellent |
Medium |
|
|
|
|
2.06 |
Big Slough-La. |
|
No Known
Issues |
|
Low |
|
|
|
|
2.07 |
Dempsey Creek / Davis
Creek |
|
No Known
Issues |
Adequate |
Low |
|
|
|
|
2.08 |
Old River - LA. |
|
No Known
Issues |
|
Low |
|
|
|
|
2.09 |
Caney Creek |
|
No Known
Issues |
Adequate |
Low |
|
|
|
503 |
3.00 |
Main-stem |
|
No Known
Issues |
Excellent |
Low |
|
|
|
|
3.01 |
Quicksand
Creek |
|
No Known
Issues |
|
Low |
|
|
|
|
3.02 |
Lost Creek /
Rocky Creek |
|
No Known
Issues |
|
Low |
|
|
|
|
3.03 |
Bayou Anacoco
- LA. |
|
No Known
Issues |
Excellent |
Medium |
|
|
|
|
3.04 |
Little Cow
Creek |
|
No Known
Issues |
Excellent |
Low |
|
|
|
|
3.05 |
Mill Creek /
Melton Creek |
|
No Known
Issues |
|
Low |
|
|
|
|
3.06 |
Pearl Creek -
LA. |
|
No Known
Issues |
|
Low |
|
|
|
|
3.07 |
Sandy Creek -
LA. |
|
No Known
Issues |
|
Low |
|
|
|
|
3.08 |
Bayou Toro -
LA. |
|
No Known
Issues |
|
Low |
|
|
|
504 |
4.00 |
Toledo Bend Reservoir |
Fish Consumption Advisory, Localized Low Dissolved
Oxygen |
Fish Consumption Advisory |
Adequate |
Low |
Conduct TMDL for Mercury |
Conduct
Periodic Fish Tissue Sampling |
|
|
4.01 |
Indian Creek / Buck Creek
/ Mill Creek / Six-Mile Creek |
|
No Known Issues |
|
Low |
|
|