Report on Rabbit
Creek Special Study – Subwatershed 5.19
Sabine River Authority of
August 31, 2003
Prepared in Cooperation with the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Table of Contents
Subwatershed 5.19 Rabbit Creek Special Study Site Map
Dissolved Metals in Water Data
Fish and Benthic Macroinvertebrate Data
Index of Biological Integrity (IBI)
The Sabine River Authority (SRA) 1998 Summary Report of
water quality in the
Sampling for benthic macroinvertebrates and fish was completed. Sampling collections were made twice, once during early summer and again during the late summer index period. Routine field and laboratory parameters, total and dissolved metals in water, and biomonitoring and rapid bio-assessment (RBA) were collected at all sites. David Hackley, City of Kilgore; Rickey Clements, East Texas Saltwater; and Adam Whisenant, TPWD, assisted during some benthic and fish collections.
The following types of samples were collected at each of the eight sites on Rabbit Creek and its tributary streams:
Ambient Sampling: Normal flow sampling included
dissolved oxygen, pH, conductivity, temperature, total dissolved solids,
chlorides, sulfates, nutrients, fecal coliform, total organic carbon, total and
dissolved metals, metals in sediment, and stream flow.
Aquatic Life: Ambient toxicity samples were taken to clarify the source and identity of toxicity seen in previous samples. In-stream rapid biological assessments of the fish and benthic communities were also done twice at each site, once during early summer and again during the late summer index period.
Priority Pollutants: In an effort to identify the toxic element indicated by biomonitoring in historical samples, a priority pollutant scan was planned for any samples for which ambient toxicity indicated consistent lethality to laboratory organisms. No toxicity was observed and therefore priority pollutants were not analyzed for any of the samples collected during this study.
Locations for sampling sites were selected to evaluate different parts of the watershed by sampling most of the major tributaries of Rabbit Creek and to monitor cumulative downstream conditions with several sites on the main-stem of Rabbit Creek.
|
SRA ID |
Description |
TNRCC # |
Parameter Set |
|
RBC03 |
Rabbit Creek near IH20 |
10371 |
AM, AT, PP*, RBA |
|
PEAV42 |
Peavine Creek at SH42 |
16680 |
AM, AT, PP*, RBA |
|
BHC02 |
Bighead Creek at FM349 |
14802 |
AM, AT, PP*, RBA |
|
RBC12 |
Rabbit Creek at FM2012 |
16681 |
AM, AT, PP*, RBA |
|
HELT1639 |
Helton Creek at FM1639 |
16682 |
AM, AT, PP*, RBA |
|
WLDS3053 |
Wilds Creek at FM3053 |
16692 |
AM, AT, PP*, RBA |
|
RB132 |
Rabbit Creek at CR132 |
16693 |
AM, AT, PP*, RBA |
|
LRB132 |
Little Rabbit Creek at CR132 |
16694 |
AM, AT, PP*, RBA |
Parameter Set Codes: AM = Ambient Sampling, AT = Ambient Toxicity, PP = Priority Pollutants, RBA = Rapid Biological Assessment.
*A priority pollutant scan was done on selected sites only if ambient toxicity indicated lethality.
The three main stem Rabbit
Creek sites were at IH20, FM2012, and CR132.
Five additional sites were located on tributaries of Rabbit Creek.
Rabbit Creek near IH20
is the furthermost downstream site sampled.
The IH20 site is a historical monitoring site and shows effects from
most of the watershed before its confluence with the
Rabbit Creek at FM2012 was selected because it is upstream from Bighead and Peavine creeks and it’s upstream from most of the runoff from the western side of Kilgore.
Little Rabbit Creek at CR132 is the receiving stream for Overton’s wastewater treatment plant.
Rabbit Creek at CR132 is located on the upstream reach of Rabbit Creek to provide data on the upstream extremities of the Rabbit Creek.
Peavine Creek at SH42 was selected to evaluate this fairly large sub-watershed west of SH42 and paralleling IH20. No known historical data exists for this tributary stream.
Bighead Creek at FM349 An upstream tributary,
Bighead Creek, is the receiving stream for the City of
Helton Creek at FM1639 has a large sub-watershed and could have significant influence on Rabbit Creek. No known historical data exist for this tributary stream. This site was used as a reference site for the area.
Wilds Creek at FM3053 has a relatively small watershed area with few obvious water quality impacts. The stream site appeared to be a good reference stream for the area. No known historical data exists for Wilds Creek.
The normal flow sample set was collected on 7/31/01. The most recent rain event was greater than seven days prior to this date. Flows measured at all sites ranged from 8.7 cubic feet per second (cfs) at RBC03 to less than one cfs at Little Rabbit, Wilds, and Peavine Creek.

Water chemistry data results were within normal ranges for
ambient surface water. Most of the sites
had less than 5 cfs of flow. The
furthermost downstream site in the watershed (RBC03) had 8.7 cfs. Turbidity ranged from 38.7-57.6 NTU at five
of the eight sites. Effluent receiving
streams had the lowest turbidity.
Bighead Creek, receiving stream for the City of
Fecal coliform bacteria were elevated, but below stream standards for a single grab sample. High turbidity may have been a factor at some sites, but turbidity and bacteriological counts did not always closely correlate. Samples were collected more than seven days after the most recent rain event

Dissolved oxygen met stream standards at all sites. The lowest dissolved oxygen (4.99 mg/l) was seen at RBC132. This site was a meter deep, 12 ft wide and had 0.8 cfs of flow when the sample was taken. Little Rabbit Creek (LRB132), the receiving stream for treated wastewater from the City of Overton, had similar depth and width, 1.5cfs of flow and had 7.73 mg/l of dissolved oxygen.

Specific conductance ranged from a low of 93 µMho at Wilds
Creek to a high of 572 µMho at Little Rabbit Creek at CR132 (LRB132). Again, Rabbit and Little Rabbit Creeks at
CR132 were significantly different.
Generally, conductivities are 100-200 µmhos higher than typical values
seen in the main stem

Total dissolved solids are calculated from the specific conductance values and so the same trends are followed. Stream standards have not been established for Rabbit Creek, but the standard is 400 mg/l for Segment 0505 Sabine River Above Toledo Bend Reservoir. All samples were below that value.

The pH was within limits for stream standards for Reach 5
of the

Stream standards for sulfates have not been established for Rabbit Creek so the standard for the Segment 0505 Sabine River Above Toledo Bend is used as a reference. The standard is an annual average of 75 mg/l and all sites fell below this value. The furthermost downstream site, RBC03, had the highest level with 32.0 mg/l.

Stream standards for chlorides have not been established for Rabbit Creek. The standard is an annual average of 175 mg/l for Segment 0505 Sabine River Above Toledo Bend. Chlorides were well under typical stream standard limits

Total hardness ranged between 24 and 72 mg/l. Hardness is an important factor in calculating the toxic limits of some metals. Components of hardness are believed to compete with metals for binding sites on cell membranes. Levels of metals sampled were below levels thought to be toxic to aquatic life.

Alkalinity ranged from a high of 90mg/l at LRB132 to a low of 20mg/l at two tributary stream sites. Alkalinity is considered to be representative of good pH buffering capacity. The pH of all sites was normal.

Turbidity ranged from 11.1NTU to 57.6NTU. These values are normal for most East Texas streams. The Rabbit Creek watershed has a lot of clay formations. Livestock have access to the stream near several sample sites.

Results from samples for dissolved metals in water are not within ranges thought to cause chronic or acute toxicity.
|
Metal (µg/l) |
RBC 03 |
BHC 02 |
PEAV 42 |
RBC 12 |
HELT 1639 |
WLDS 3053 |
LRB 132 |
RB132 |
|
Arsenic |
< 10 |
< 10 |
< 10 |
< 10 |
< 10 |
< 10 |
< 10 |
< 10 |
|
Barium |
302 |
119 |
446 |
302 |
272 |
164 |
351 |
198 |
|
Cadmium |
< 0.2 |
< 0.2 |
< 0.2 |
< 0.2 |
< 0.2 |
< 0.2 |
< 0.2 |
< 0.2 |
|
Chromium |
< 3 |
< 3 |
< 3 |
< 3 |
< 3 |
< 3 |
< 3 |
< 3 |
|
Copper |
< 2 |
5 |
< 2 |
< 2 |
< 2 |
< 2 |
< 2 |
< 2 |
|
Lead |
< 2 |
< 2 |
< 2 |
< 2 |
< 2 |
< 2 |
NM |
<2 |
|
Nickel |
5.6 |
6.4 |
3.6 |
1.9 |
1 |
<15 |
3 |
1 |
|
Silver |
< 2 |
< 2 |
< 2 |
< 2 |
< 2 |
< 2 |
< 2 |
< 2 |
|
Zinc |
10 |
36 |
3 |
4 |
4 |
<2 |
2 |
<2 |
|
Mercury (sediment) |
NM |
< 0.2 |
< 0.2 |
< 0.2 |
< 0.2 |
< 0.2 |
NM |
<0.2 |
|
Selenium |
< 3 |
< 3 |
< 3 |
< 3 |
< 3 |
< 3 |
< 3 |
< 3 |
Ambient toxicity samples taken during past years (1995 and 1996) indicated some possible toxicity at Rabbit Creek at IH20 (RBC03), the furthermost downstream publicly accessible site. Samples taken during this study did not identify any toxicity at that site. There has been no toxicity observed in present or historical samples to Pimephales.
|
Site |
TNRCC# |
Date Tested |
Ceriodaphnia dubia |
Pimephales promelas |
|
|
Historical
Data Review |
|||||
|
RBC03 |
10371 |
2/14/1995 |
Sublethality |
No
toxicity |
|
|
RBC03 |
10371 |
5/16/1995 |
No
toxicity |
No
toxicity |
|
|
RBC03 |
10371 |
8/1/1995 |
Lethality |
No
toxicity |
|
|
RBC03 |
10371 |
11/7/1995 |
Sublethality |
No
toxicity |
|
|
RBC03 |
10371 |
1/17/1996 |
No
toxicity |
No
toxicity |
|
|
RBC03 |
10371 |
4/29/1996 |
Lethality |
No
toxicity |
|
|
RBC03 |
10371 |
5/7/1996 |
Sublethality |
Not
Tested |
|
|
RBC03 |
10371 |
7/30/1996 |
No
toxicity |
No
toxicity |
|
|
RBC03 |
10371 |
10/17/96 |
No
toxicity |
No
toxicity |
|
|
Normal
Flow Sample Event |
|||||
|
RBC03 |
10371 |
07/31/02 |
No
toxicity |
No
toxicity |
|
|
BHC02 |
14802 |
07/31/02 |
No
toxicity |
No
toxicity |
|
|
PEAV42 |
16680 |
07/31/02 |
No
toxicity |
No
toxicity |
|
|
RBC12 |
16681 |
07/31/02 |
No
toxicity |
No
toxicity |
|
|
HELT1639 |
16682 |
07/31/02 |
No
toxicity |
No
toxicity |
|
|
WLDS3053 |
16692 |
07/31/02 |
No
toxicity |
No
toxicity |
|
|
LRB132 |
16694 |
07/31/02 |
No
toxicity |
No
toxicity |
|
|
RB132 |
16693 |
07/31/02 |
No
toxicity |
No
toxicity |
|
Fish and benthic macroinvertebrates (aquatic, bottom-dwelling, insects and other invertebrates) were collected twice at each site, once in early summer and again in the late summer index period. The index of biological integrity (IBI) and the USEPA Rapid Bioassessment (RBA) Protocol II were applied to assess the health of each population. The IBI was used to analyze fish data and assign an aquatic life use for each site.
All of the sampled streams scored "Intermediate" to “High” using the IBI. Wilds and Little Rabbit Creek scored “Intermediate” during the spring sample but scored higher during the summer sample. When the two scores were different, the summer score was better. These scores are typical for most Upper Sabine Basin streams sampled by SRA.

The RBA is used to evaluate the benthic macroinvertebrate community and stream habitat and compare study sites against a relatively non-impacted reference site. It was determined that Helton Creek at FM1639 (HELT1639) was most suitable for a reference stream.


Sites that fall near the curve have benthic community characteristics that are expected in the habitat that was available for colonization. Sites that fall significantly below the curve have a benthic community that was not as species rich and/or there were fewer intolerant organisms as would be expected in the habitat seen. In the early summer sample, Rabbit Creek at IH20 and Bighead Creek at the new loop scored slightly impaired. The rest of the early summer sites produced benthic communities expected in the respective habitats. Late summer samples showed more stress to the benthic population, with the site on Bighead Creek still showing some impairment and a few of the other sites straying a little farther below the sigmoid curve. The primary reason Bighead Creek scored lower was due to its benthic population being skewed towards dipterans (midges). The site also had lower species evenness and high representation of stress-tolerant species. Benthic scoring tends to separate sites more than using fish and the IBI, but both types of biological sampling indicate that, while there are some signs of stress, these sites are quite similar to other streams that have been evaluated in the Upper Basin.
The primary parameters of concern from previous data evaluations were non-support of stream standards for dissolved oxygen and fecal coliform, and concerns for ambient toxicity. Historical data were collected from Rabbit Creek near IH20 and from one site on Bighead Creek. For this study, eight sites on Rabbit Creek and several significant tributary streams were evaluated. Water quality data from a normal flow sample set indicated no significant water quality concerns at that time. Standing alone, one set of water samples is very inconclusive. On the assumption that historical concerns were caused by non-point inflows, it was hoped that a rain event sample set might indicate some regions or parameters that were contributing to the concerns observed at the downstream site on Rabbit Creek near IH20. Biological sampling was finished prior to sampling a rain event and indicated fish and benthic communities typical for the region. The biological results indicate water quality sufficient to support a healthy variety of fish and invertebrates that have been sustained over a period of time to allow for full life cycles. Earlier physical and chemical sampling at Rabbit Creek at IH20 indicated some concerns, however it appears at this time to be indicative of conditions that are typical of East Texas streams; relatively sluggish streams with high natural organic loading, warm waters, high turbidity and high associated bacteriological presence. The most downstream site on Rabbit Creek had non-typical habitat due to addition of cobble to the streambed for stream stabilization at the interstate highway right-of-way. In this “enhanced” habitat, four different darter species were collected. Darters are quite common but it is unusual to collect that many darter species from one site.